This past weekend I did it. I made my nervous NY acting debut at ModFab's reading of "Conquest of the Universe or When Queens Collide" by Charles Ludlam , the pioneer of the 'theater of the ridiculous' movement. I played a triple role: one of the dancing Fire Woman of Mars, a newsboy, and the galactic demon "War" For the latter part I was supposed to get all shouty and rally my minions --think Mel Gibson in Braveheart or Gerard Butler in 300. So, yeah: total typecasting [snort] I was most convincing as the 'gee whiz' newsboy. This is because I only had two lines and all it required was channeling old movie "extra! extra!" type of vocal cadences. That I can do.
I am not an actor. I've been so certain of this for so long that I haven't even tried it since high school when I stank up the joint in exactly one play, a madcap comedy. I signed up for this reading on account of my friendship with the Modern & Fabulous one and because --once I stopped to really consider who I'd get to work with it -- I thought it might be good for me.
We had two days of rehearsals wherein we ran through the play about five times. My part(s) was very small but I was incredibly nervous. The professional actors and theater people all around me... if they had nerves it didn't show. The theater of the ridiculous allows you plenty of room for interpretation and covers for a lot of amateur hour silliness like mine thank god but my costars didn't need any covering up. I was quite impressed with them and, as a nonactor, fascinated by the diversity of approaches. Some of the actors seemed to be doing nothing for two or three run throughs and then suddenly, the full character emerged like an instant polaroid. Other actors started turned all the way up to 11 and chiseled it down as they went, as if they were sculptors. And some were like painters, you could see the picture they were creating all along but it just got less sketchy and more colorfully defined in each run through.
I write about acting all the time. I read about it. I watch tons of it. I understand a lot more than your average civilian about technique, acting theory, and whatnot. But I haven't really experienced working alongside them before. Now having done so, even if only in a tiny way, I am both alarmed and pleased to report that it is still a total mindblowing thing. This magical artform lost none of its mystery. I am even more in awe of those who can act. What a gift.
Monday, March 26, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Yay for acting!
Who participated in this read-through? Any names?
Darn, I wish I could've come and seen ya, Nat. You're just gonna have to do more acting in the future to accomodate me. Maybe you can be Vanessa Redgrave's understudy for Year of Magical Thinking now? ;-)
The next time I'm in town I fully expect a concert performance of your role/s.
Nat was much better than he's letting on...yes, he was nervous, but I don't think the audience was aware of it. It was a real joy to have him share in the experience, and the fact that cared so much about doing his best made me love him all the more.
The reading had a few known "downtown actors" who populate the Off and Off-Off Broadway scene, most notably the one and only Nomi Tichman, who blew us all away with a role played once upon a time by Jackie Curtis, Natolia (Queen of Saturn). Because the play was so much fun, however, I really just tried to bring a lot of my talented friends together...and Nathaniel is certainly in that category. :-)
The craft of acting has always fascinated me. I might have gotten into it myself if I wasn't riddled with self doubt.
But, congrats on getting up on a stage and doing it. That's more than a lot of people get to do.
awwww A STAR IS BORN
Nat or Judy. WHO IS THE ULTIMATE STAR?!?
Judy.
Post a Comment