Three reasons to take another look at
Love Field:
1) Nathaniel, like many a Pfan, spends a lot more time on Michelle's
other 1992 performance. You know the one.
meow2)
Hairspray is not the first time Michelle has walked the (color) line, and in a platinum wig to boot.
3) We're all actressexuals here. We can look at
Love Field whenever we want. Is it a crime to look at
Love Field?
Love Field, named after the Dallas airport where the Kennedys landed on November 22, 1963, doesn't have the greatest reputation. It was one of those early 90s movies that only premiered several years after principal photography wrapped, and only in very limited release, because the studio, Orion, had gone bankrupt. Think
Blue Sky, and consider a mini-thesis about doomed vanity projects where major actressexual icons of the 80s play erratic 60s housewives with blinding hair. Also think
Blue Sky because, like Lange in that film, Pfeiffer got a Best Actress Oscar nomination for
Love Field in a reputedly dire year for that category, and despite the fact that neither woman could get anyone to buy a ticket for their movies. Even the die-hard fans weren't so bowled over. Have you
ever heard Nathaniel be
this terse about Michelle? At the Pfeiffer Pfan ConPventions, they schedule the "
Love Field Love-In" at 8:30am on the day people are still arriving, if you know what I mean, and most of the conversation still turns to
Susie Diamond.
I'm not on a major recuperation mission here;
Love Field is not a great movie, and it often can't decide whether to play as a farce, as you might expect from screenwriter Don Roos (
The Opposite of Sex,
Happy Endings) or as a Serious Drama, as the studio probably preferred and director Jonathan Kaplan, who had recently directed Jodie Foster to an Oscar in
The Accused, seems to have wished. Watch the scene where Lurene Hallett (Pfeiffer) regrets to inform fellow bus passenger and cutey patootie Paul Cater (Dennis Haysbert) that she has just mistakenly reported him as a kidnapping suspect to the FBI, and that they'll both hafta skeedaddle out of this Tennessee Greyhound station lightning quick. Roos thinks this is funny, I think, though not without the charged implications of racial profiling and unnecessary roughness. The movie wouldn't work if it were
only played for comedy, but where Roos' avalanche of dramatic incidents and tart dialogue cry out for some kind of halfway-screwball approach, Kaplan ladles in lots of portentous night-shots and cheesily ominous music, as though he's been inspired by the hokiest, cheapest aspects of
Mississippi Burning.
Kaplan earns his keep in the two most carefully framed and inventively shot sequences in the movie: an eerie, extended crane shot in which the rest of Dallas is slowly learning the lethal fate of JFK (but before Kennedy disciple Lurene has figured it out), and the last shot of the movie, which captures Lurene's flakiness as well as her emotional generosity without totally pulling focus away from Haysbert's climactic reunion with his daughter. But this careful balancing of tones, the sweet and the serious, the kooky and the acute, is a feat the Pfeiffer pulls off much more often than her director does, and much more memorably.
Notice how, when Kaplan attempts to push the piece in different tonal directions, he veers pretty wildly, disrupting almost any consistency in the piece. Here is
Love Field as a perky, semi-serious period comedy...
...and here is
Love Field as a glossy celebration of its heavenly star...
...and here is
Love Field as a risky, color-saturated, almost expressionist melodrama about race, class, gender, and political inequalities:
Ungainly, no? Michelle has to work to keep up with a movie that keeps changing its mind about itself, but by hitting so many notes within her own performancecomic, earnest, self-deluding, lonely, alarmed, frightened, plaintive, slapstick, romantic, angryshe convinces us that the schizophrenic movie is reflecting Lurene's many sides, rather than (more likely) forcing its actress into a kind of recovery mission. The through-thread in the performance is that Pfeiffer doesn't pretend that Lurene is bright or "underappreciated": she has an unreasonable identification with Jackie Kennedy, she makes several
faux pas about The State of the Negro, and she doesn't even learn from her mistakes, because she makes the same
faux pas again. And yet, Pfeiffer shows that Lurene can be slow-witted and stupid without
playing her as slow-witted and stupid. Instead, she plays the good intentions and the human warmth, and allows the script to clarify when and how these benevolent traits get misplaced or misfired. We always understand Lurene (and occasionally feel sorry for her), even when we laugh at her a little. She gives the character several moments of realizing that she's being condescended towhen Haysbert offers her a
Look Magazine because it "has a lot of pictures," when he and an African-American auto mechanic lament Lurene's white-liberal dizzinessbut Pfeiffer makes an interesting choice to freeze up and cloud over her face in these moments. Lurene doesn't get all Angela Bassett or all Erin Brockovich about being made a fool of; recognizing her errors, Lurene realizes she doesn't know the "correct" way to defend herself, and so she lingers in inchoate uncertainty.
After
Love Field, Kaplan's career mostly detoured into failed B-movies like the Andie MacDowell western
Bad Girls and the bracing but forgettable Madeleine Stowe thriller
Unlawful Entry. Lots of other people went on to do better work, often to the explicit discredit of
Love Field: Roos wrote sturdier, more adventurous movies, some of which he even directed with real aplomb (tonally, if not visually); Haysbert magnificently semi-romanced another deluded but gorgeously-intentioned white housewife in
Far from Heaven; blink-and-you'll-miss-her Beth Grant earned better spotlights for her delicious caricatures of high-strung eccentrics in
Donnie Darko and
Little Miss Sunshine. As for Pfeiffer, she rode a bus much more expressively in the opening scenes of
Frankie and Johnny (still my favorite of her performances) than she does here, and the daring stylization of Catwoman and romantic raptures of Countess Ellen Olenska made
Love Field look like a shoestringy, between-commitments type of project. As the 90s wore on, she took a lot more of those movies (
To Gillian on Her 37th Birthday,
One Fine Day,
Up Close & Personal,
The Story of Us...), so maybe
Love Field, sticking out in odd, unbeloved ways amidst the most exciting and courageous passage in her career, looks unflattering now as a harbinger of future films that wouldn't quite deserve her, or demand enough of her.
But hell, you know? It's an admirable and engaging performance, and she did win Best Actress at the Berlin Film Festival. She gets some great moments out of a hot pink carrying-case, a partially memorized license plate, a cantaloupe-colored suit with matching hat, a missed encounter with Jackie O., and a nervous grab at her unfastened sweater as she briskly, hilariously walks diagonally through her final shot. Pfeiffer's Lurene is certainly the equal of agreeable also-rans in other years, like Renée Zellweger in
Bridget Jones's Diary or (dare I suggest it?) Annette Bening in
Being Julia, and though no sensible voter would have denied the 1992 Best Actress Oscar to Emma Thompson in
Howards End, all four of the fellow nominees (to include Sarandon in
Lorenzo's Oil, Deneuve in
Indochine, and the marvelous Mary McDonnell in
Passion Fish) deserve more credit than the media of the moment afforded them. Pfeiffer's Lurene is not an immortal creation, but in fact she's agreeably and appropriately miniature: a kind, sheltered gal who isn't quite as silly as she looks, nor as sober and stately as star-vehicle sometimes require. She's behind glass a little bit, tentatively tapping on the door of a wider world that she doesn't know much about. It's fun to join her for the outset of that journey.