Monday, March 06, 2006

Black Sunday

As all of you presumably know, Brokeback Mountain, a film with a Schindler's List style-tally of unanimous awardage acclaim, social importance, and unexpectedly strong cultural and box office pull --indeed the "it" film of the year, lost to a film with but one significant precursor award: It's as if the Full Monty beat Titanic (sounds like a joke but tis true).

I will have more to say about this later today over here.

But for now...
My Sincere Thanks
To the readers who sent in e-mails of condolence last night, anticipating the black cloud that would be hanging over my head. You didn't have to do that. But please know that you are deeply appreciated (and kind)

My Middle Finger
To the media homophobes who struggled mightily (and triumphantly, are you proud?) to unseat a film that took the very unpopular stance of taking gay relationships seriously and exposing the poison and tragedy of the closet for all people.

My Condolescences
To the fans who are hurting. As I always say: "a great film is its own reward"

My Sincere Huh?--Say What? Who Are You?
To Academy Voters: So you don't like the zeitgeist film that won all the precursors, had strong box office and legend making reviews, that marked a personal best for a beloved filmmaker, a film that became a cultural landmark and a watershed mainstream/traditional cinema moment? The kind of film you ALWAYS love. But not this one? Wow, a first.

If you need some righteous anger and some right-on commenting about the state of the world and their respect (or, rather, lack thereof) for gay people here are some good places to go:
Oh My Trill Shame on you, Academy!
Queering the ApparatusFucking Crash !?!?!?
Modern Fabulousity Gay Bashing at the Oscars
The Envelope "Breaking No Ground"

87 comments:

Anonymous said...

You forget The Full Monty also had the BAFTA going into Oscar night, as well as the SAG ensemble.

Sorry, that didn't help did it?

Maybe in a few days when we've calmed ourselves this will not be the end of the world that it at first seems. The whole media is talking about how it didn't win and what a shock it was. The Crash win (and backlash) may give Brokeback a bigger spotlight in the short term than winning would have done.

Naively optimistic? Trying the make the best of it?

Rob

Anonymous said...

I am still in shock. This is a result that is going to be seen as an Oscar injustice for years. How such a beautiful and important film with all the momentum and pre-Oscars Awards behind it can be so cruely snubbed by the Academy is beyond me. (I would not even have nominated Crash as Best Picture as I believe that both Walk the Line and The Constant Gardener were more deserving of its spot in the big 5.)

Chin up Nathaniel, we all know that Brokeback is the best film of the bunch. Looking forward to your tips for next years awards.

Chris, UK.

Justin said...

I wore all black today! It is a sad, sad day!

Air said...

Hi Nathaniel. I've never posted here before but I've been following your site since October or so.

I came here first thing this morning because I knew how you'd feel and I knew that I could find comfort. I also must admit that I did cry my eyes out and leave the room when they announced it last night.

As a person who wishes to pursue a career in film, as crazy as it is, I tend to take these things personally. I had yet to be burned by the Academy's stupidity as you and many others have in the past. (I am rather young).

Anyway. I wanted to post and be one of the many who shares your pain and needed somewhere to congregate.

Let's just hope we can throw this in the Academy's face 10 years down the road when Brokeback is the landmark film and Crash is not.

PoliVamp said...

Well, God knows the Academy couldn't bring itself to recognize genius before, I don't know why I am so shocked/angry as I am.

Maybe it's because of the homophobia. Maybe it's because I truly thought that a movie that was brilliantly made, a movie that was a force of nature, was going to win. The love I feel was going to be validated.

Everyone talks about the severe fuckups of the Academy (Citizen Kane, Alfred Hitchcock, Richard Burton, Judy Garland). I take small solace in the fact that the Academy will be ripped to shreds in the future for this decision.

Nathanial, we all had our hopes up. God help this shitty world we live in.

Anonymous said...

Yeah God knows its all about how everyone hates the gays...pleez

popontherocks said...

I felt physically ill. Clearly I have issues. But cleary the Academy does as well.

chofer said...

When THE ACADEMY has become the ultimate word in FILM EXCELLENCE???

Rocky, Driving Miss Daisy, Gladiator, A Beautiful Mind, and now Crash.
Some are worse than others. Some others, you won't remember or bother to see it by next year.(I surely didn't!!)

Scorsese, Altman (fuck the Honorary Oscar!!) Goddard, Buñuel, Kurosawa, Almodovar, Lynch, Cronenberg, Chabrol, Wong, et al.
When DID films of these now legendaries directors win the Oscar??

I always see the Oscars for the show, not the justice (they have little to none at all, as the posts read here showed concerning the actors snubbed over the years)

So, giving my preference for BBM, I expected to enjoy the show through the tech awards.

I barely stand it!! It was as bad as it gets!!

I SAW DEAD PEOPLE LAST NIGHT!!

In the end, the tip of the iceberg.

That shows the AMPAS are not that MUCH HOMOPHOBIC AS THEY ARE JUST BLAND!!

PAINFULLY BLAND.

BLAND AS A FEARFUL LIBERAL WITH GUILTY FEELINGS.

BLAND AS A GOLDEN STATUETTE WHICH HAPPENS TO GOT NO BALLS AT ALL.

GET OVER IT PEOPLE!!

If you're looking for quality films see who's winning at Cannes, Berlin or Venice instead. And stop thinking of Oscars as the Supreme Court of Cinema!!!

adam k. said...

Hi Nathaniel!

I'm so glad your head didn't explode. And that your heart didn't stop. But so sorry too... 'tis a sad, sad day. I am missing class right now because I just can't deal with it... I was up all night in mourning, and cannot face the sun. But all will be well. I am rather excited for the backlash this will create. Frightfully, historically bad decision.

Man, I feel bad for Jack. I don't think he wanted to have to say the dreaded word. My first impulse was to blame him, but don't shoot the messenger, man.

popontherocks said...

Jack said he voted for Brokeback Mountain

Anonymous said...

My God, I feel like someone died. I guess because it's that irreparable & historical. I never expected myself to react like this. I guess I'm just looking for comfort & community online, to know that I'm not alone. Because I had to walk into the office the morning & hear a gloating coworker say to me, "You didn't think they'd really give it **that movie,** did you?"

Julia said...

I just spent the last 20 minutes on the phone crying my eyes out to my mother about what a terrible injustice this is. (I too am rather young to the Oscar-watching game, and had yet to be really burned by the Academy).

This will go down in movie history as one of the worst losses ever, in any category.

JavierAG said...

Whatever. I'm not kidding when I say that I hold the Film Bitch awards and the Venice Film Festival in higher regard than the Oscars, even when I disagree with them.

OhMyTrill said...

Yes Javierag...the film bitch awards are most likely the awards I have the most respect for these days...
still can't believe it

Anonymous said...

From studying film to being enchanted by it, the cinema has always been a major part of my life. My Oscar prognostics began in 1996; the Oscar issue of Entertainment Weekly with Fiennes and Thomas on the cover was the one that finally did it. From there on predicting the Oscar was taken to a whole other level for me. And I’ve had my share of shocks, disappoints and devastations…
…but nothing could have prepared me for the tragedy of March 5, 2006.
The tragedy last night shook me to the core. 95% because one of the cinema’s most haunting love stories was robbed, but because I feel like my work and analysis for the past decade has been an utter joke. I have a question for veteran Oscar addicts? Has anyone experienced such a sting as this in all their prognostic history? How deep will this cut? Many of close friends how sworn off the Oscar, Globes only they say, and while the notion does sound extreme, I have to wonder… is it? Maybe I’m just too new to the whole Oscar prediction community and have never experienced such an upset? FOR ALL YOU VETERAN OSCAR EXPERTS I HAVE A QUESTION; Does the shock and raw sting of BBM’s upset transcend all the past Academy screwups?

*CRITICAL QUESTIONS OR VETERAN OSCAR EXPERTS?

a) Will the pain heal? Come August will I be able to dissect the Oscar race with the same zealous passion as I have before?

OR

b) Does this upset chart new territory?

*No matter what happens, I can hope that Nathaniel (a ridiculously talented, witty, film scholar whose passion and expertise of the cinema inspire us all) will imprint some kind of tribute to this tragedy on his website. Yes, March 5 will unquestionable “leave in infamy” and remembered as a dark day for Hollywood but I need to know….
….Can Oscar prognostics go on?

NATHANIEL R said...

rob -always look for the silver lining. i wish i was better at that. the ken turan piece is an EXCELLENT slap on the wrist for the LA community.

chris -i hope i can muster them up. i feel no enthusiasm for talking Oscar now ;)

justin -i see your black and raise you bathrobe. i haven't even showered. it's TOTAL depression. ha ha

air -you don't have to wait 10 years. everyone knows that brokeback is a landmark. Even those who think it will be dated in years to come (like a guess who's coming to dinner) agree that it's landmark. it will last forever.

polivamp -your shocked and angry for the same reason we all are. This time they had no excuse. Every society group etc.. was saying this is the best. and so by them saying: NO, NO. it really is about the larger issue because history tells us that they follow the precursor leads. so to think for themselves and reject? that is a VERY big deal.

anonymous -if you can't engage in the discussion you might want to ask yourself "why?" or at least "why do other people feel like this?" you might learn something.

potr -exactly.

chofer -sure. absolutely agree. i never think the oscars are about ART. but they are about SOCIETY which is why this rejection is so painful.

julia -i'm so sorry. * big hug*

Anonymous said...

Let's also recognize the irony of recognizing Robert Altman, a 70's iconoclast who wasn't recognized appropriately in his heyday, a man who directed a richly woven narrative set in LA that was ignored, the same year they recognize Crash.

Ryan said...

"i never think the Oscars are about ART. But they are about SOCIETY which is why this rejection is so painful."

-That's the most genuine and profound comment on this calamity I've yet to hear (media, Oscar websites or otherwise)

chofer said...

Nat, I feel very sorry.

I am not an American (I lived in NY one year and I remember joyful times spent at the Angelika, embracing my full love for ART films).
But I guess americans didn't have to wait for a BBM wake up call to know in which society you are living in.
Suffice it to say Mr. Bush had a run for a consecutive presidency (by a good margin).
Didn't you have a more telling wake up call back then??

Again, I feel very sorry.

Anonymous said...

-I'm going all out; Naomi Watts- 21 Grams style, on this one- and it will take more than a spiritual consolation from Sean Penn to retrieve me from the abyss of devastation.

(I put my faith in Nathaniel in help get us through this without detracting from what a genuine tragedy this is)

NATHANIEL R said...

chofer -sure. Bush is one thing. this is my thing. it's disappointing that the hatred can so thoroughly sink in to my chosen world as well as the real one.

Ben said...

First of all, my condolences Nathaniel. I've had my heartaches in the past (Gladiator, A Beautiful Mind)

But I must say, as a Crash fan, I've been dreading going on the internet today. Yes, there are numerous articles on how bad the Academy fucked it up. I was actually happy last night- Picture, Director, Actor, and Actress went the way I THOUGHT they should have.

I dreaded coming online because I didn't want to see rewardng a film I love to be labeled as homophobia. Guess what, everyone? Homophobia is a huge issue today, but so is racism! If we're going to judge movies on the issues they take on, I don't think you can claim homophobia is somehow more important than racism.

Why I think Crash won. Let's remember- individual people vote- it's not a panel:

-It is emotionally wrenching. So is Brokeback, but maybe not so blatantly. We all know the Academy likes emotion- not always a bad thing.
-It's about racism in LA!! People really related and felt convicted and moved by it. Again, same as Brokeback, but Crash is a bit closer to home.
-Brokeback was incredibly hyped. Let's always gonna lead to some dissapointment for some people. Crash was more of a sleeper (like Million Dollar Baby last year).

But when it comes down to it, the reason it won was when it came time to mark the ballot, voters chose what they liked best. A plurality picked Crash (it could have been 25% or 40%- who knows?). Just like in '98 a plurality picked Shakespeare in Love.

I guess my main point is- don't see the win as purely anti-Brokeback. Remember- Ang Lee won, so there was clearly significant support for Brokeback. It's also pro-Crash. You can disagree with the Academy, but don't pretend to know the motives of all the voters.

Brad said...

Maybe the best pre-cursor for the Oscars is the annual "ASK CELEBRITIES WHAT THEIR FAVORITE FILM OF THE YEAR WAS" in the People Magazine year end wrap up.

I suppose hindsight is 20/20 - but when Jodie Foster, Denzel Washington, and Shirley MacLaine all cite CRASH as the best film of the year - thats a pretty good indicator that the film is going to have huge cross over appeal in the Academy. At least in the acting branch (biggest voting body).

chofer said...

Nat, maybe it's because OUR chosen world will never trascend the ghetto? Like the real one?

I'm just trying to figure it all out.
I only have questions right now.

John T. said...

I too, also wore black all day today-it is a sad day for the movies. I'm now understanding what filmephiles must have felt when How Green Was My Valley beat Citizen Kane, or when In the Heat of the Night beat Bonnie and Clyde and The Graduate.

chofer said...

Ben, I think I am talking for all the BBM supporters here when I'm telling you I never implied racism was a lesser issue than homophobia.
I just think BBM get a better hint at homophobia than Crash did at racism.
And I am surely know it is the BETTER picture (as the many awards it received showed)
The Academy always comes late when it comes to adress "complicated" ISSUES.
The Color Purple was snubbed back in 1985 when depicted the racism implications WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY.
It seems NOW is more acceptable to award a picture dealing with themes of racism.
It is just no time to deal with their own homophobia.
Maybe Hollywood has a slow digestion of things "complicated".
It's IRONIC. Those who don't have problems with digestion NOW are taking the whole supply of ALKA SELTZER!!

A.D. (dzong2) said...

I know I shouldn't write this because I'll just upset people and get crucified on this board, but I'm happy Crash won because I really thought Crash was a much better movie. As a proud young gay male, I though Brokeback Mountain was a great achievement mostly for its place in history....It was a gay romance that touched the American mainstream. Part of me wanted it to win because I LOVE anything that gets the religious right angry. But I really do believe that it was hyped because people considered it a "gay movie" and different, and it made for good entertainment news. I didn't think it was anything more than a "good movie". Congratulations to Crash. We all know that Brokeback Mountain came in a close second and it will still go down in history.

Anonymous said...

Oh, get over it already. It's a friggin' award that will be forgotten within the month.

Trashbag Kid said...

At the very least, most of the articles coming out are probably gonna be about how Brokeback was robbed, not about how Crash deserved it.

I haven't been this dissapointed by the Oscars EVER.

At least Ang won. I love him.

Trashbag Kid said...

Man, anonymous people on these things need to stop posting on movie sites about how movies don't matter.

It's silly.

Ben said...

Hey Chofer-

I respect your opinion on the merits of BBM versus Crash. But let's remember- it's what we each think. This is not speed skating- it's judging works of art. By the way, winning more awards doesn't make a picture better. It means more critics groups chose it then other movies. So the Academy differed.

It's all subjective- I just can't buy the morning-after homophobia chorus.

Devin Conroy said...

I am truly sorry for what occurred last night. I am not close to being over it either. If you or your fans want another perspective, feel free to link my profile www.myspace.com/devinconroy. It is all about film and my blog has a lot about the controversy that took place last night. Thanks so much!

Emma said...

Darling, I totally know how you feel. I've been reading your blog for ages now, and I've been like you, sure that BBM would win, not even considering what I'd do if it didn't win, because I was so sure that it would. IT DESERVED IT. IT DID.

Look, if it makes you feel any better:

http://mysticdollarredemption.blogspot.com/2006/03/why-crash-stealing-from-brokeback.html

Emma. xxx

Ali said...

Get well soon Nathaniel!

Do not grieve for long (I know it's hard); Brokeback is in good company - it will be deemed a classic a few years from now (hell, this Crash upset will just speed things along).

chofer said...

Ben

Off course an Award desn't make a picture better than the other (ditto for CRASH)
But isn't it curious BBM had won ALL the precursor awards (except two, going for CAPOTE and GNGL)and CRASH had none?
I won't waste my time saying AGAIN why CRASH is a good movie...if only made for TV (when dialogues are as unrealistic and bombastic as you hope for, for the sake of short lapses of attention WE ALL tv viewers have)
I'll just say HOMOPHOBIA in Hollywood is a perfectly conceivable, well documented issue.
See THE CELULLOID CLOSET (documentary made of people INSIDE the industry) and then we'll speak.

We are not making this up, Ben.

dannyboy said...

I'm really upset too. What was the Academy thinking? Even if you don't think BROKBACK was the best film of the year (and I don't, although I did think it was better than it's competition on the ballot), there's no way this can look like anything but homophobia on the Academy's part.

One precedent for this, it seems to me, is the New York response to the play cycle, A TEXAS TRILOGY by Preston Jones, back in the 1970s. It got such high acclaim from all the critics around the country and the awards groups, basically winning everything it could on its way, slowly, to Broadway--largely at a celebrated engagement at the Kennedy Center in D.C.--that when it got to the final stop in its journey, a Broadway engagement, everyone in NYC was just out to get it. A theater professor explained to us about this black mark in American Film history in class once: It was as if they all collectively said in New York: "we're not letting anyone out there beyond our little group tell US what's the best play of the year. WE'RE going to decide what's the best play of the year." In short, the trilogy became a victim of its early success.

That's really one of the few legit things the odious David Poland said on his blog, during his whole, obsessive, "anything but BROKEBACK" campaign: That there is always the possibility of something doing SO well in the days leading up to the Oscars that the Academy will vote for something else just to avoid the "us too" sense that would come from them giving Best Picture to BROKEBACK. (Even SCHINDLER and TITANIC lost a few more things than did BROKEBACK.)

Still, now the Academy has to live with the legacy they've created. Instead of saying "us too!" about loving BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, they'll go down in history as having said "not us" to the opportunity to seem enlightened, to seem like they have good taste, to seem like they're politically sensitive in these terribly regressive times. All CRASH says, is what Rodney King said back in the early 90s: "can't we all just get along?" And the film didn't say it any better than he did, frankly.

My old theater Prof. said there was actually a book or article or something written about the nastiness involving the New York Critics' response to A TEXAS TRILOGY. Someone will have to write a book about this fiasco at the Oscars last night.

Shawn Elmore said...

Nathaniel, isn't it awful? Just disgusting. Cheer up and buck up today. I know it's hard. I am still in shock and I am not afraid to admit that I cried when it happened. Thanks for all your hard work and determination. *sigh* WHY did this happen?

dusty said...

I've only followed the Oscar race now for four years, but, after last night's ceremony, I'm really reconsidering the hobby.

I was burned long before Brokeback Mountain (my seventh favorite film of the year, but still my favorite among the nominees) was so rudely and historically snubbed. I first considered changing the channel halfway through the show, when that completely mediocre Hustle and Flow ditty won. I watched the band accept their undeserved Oscar, and I realized the only reason I even tuned in this year, the only thing that kept me going all season, was the off-chance Dolly Parton might win, and for the year's second or third best song. And that's straight-up ridiculous. Throw a bone, AMPAS!

Anyway, enough about me. This is your blog, after all. I offer my condolences. And I look forward to what will hopefully prove a much better year -- for the Oscars, that is. The cinema is already fantastic.

Ben said...

Chofer,

I never said homophobia is not an issue in Hollywood (and by the way I have seen The Celluoid Closet). What I continue to say is that it is unfair to defame those who voted for Crash by calling them homophobic. When Saving Private Ryan lost, did we say "the Academy" had a deep prejudice against WW2 veterans??

The critics groups and the Golden Globes are voted on by a MUCH smaller number of people than the Academy. I think that's why we get some strange surprises every few years (Shakespeare in Love, Chariots of Fire, Braveheart).

There is no obligation to vote for the front-runner. It's not yes or no. It's voting for one of five movies. Again, I think Crash hit a lot of people in the gut, and they went with their gut.If homophobia was the main reason it didn't win, wouldn't Ang Lee and Larry McMurtry also have lost?

If Crash had lost and people had said it was because voters didn't like dealing with racial conflict, I would have made the same argument against that.

Peace out!

John P. said...

People are crying over this? I hope that my films never have to suffer the horrible injustice of garnering 8 Oscar nominations and 3 wins. Brokeback deserved to win, yes, and it was cheated out of BP by a vastly inferior film, yeah, but these are the people who gave Helen Hunt an Oscar. BbM has already entrenched itself in our cultural consciousness and it will continue to reach new audiences, whether or not some senile Angelenos give it a shiny piece of gold-painted plastic. I think the rhetoric surrounding this snub - 'virulent homophobia' and so forth - is a dangerous bit of equivocation that shortchanges real victims of homophobia. I mean, I definitely understand everyone's disappointment, but Christ, get some perspective. Zimbabwe imprisons and executes homosexuals; the Academy didn't honour BbM as much as people had hoped. I really can't get too worked up over this.

I enjoy and respect Nathaniel's work and the spirit of community surrounding this website, but I just can't throw my hat in the ring on this particular bit of collective outrage.

Devin Conroy said...

Ben,

I have to disagree with you on this. I truly think homophobia was a factor, although I do not believe it was the lone factor in any way. To answer your hypothetical about how they won the screenplay and directing awards: Only Best Picture is decided by the entire group of members of AMPAS. The other categories are decided in smaller, specialized groups. This is especially true for the screenplay award. I think that everyone had to give the directing nod to Ang Lee because he had been snubbed before, and the voters who knew they were making a controversial decision to vote for Crash tried to "make things right" by throwing a bone to Brokeback. The fact is that voting Crash in for Best Picture is WRONG. It was only my third favorite of the nominees (behind GN and GL and Capote), but it deserved the award. Every possible precursor proved this. I am not ripping Crash. I am simply criticizing this end outcome. Brokeback Mountain is this year's Best Picture.

Jean-Jacques said...

"Gay Bashing at the Oscars" – March 5 was also Pier Paolo Pasolini's birthday

Ben said...

Devin,

Am I understanding you when you say it is a fact that to vote for Crash is WRONG??? No voter is obligated to vote for anything. I think it's kind of strange to not vote for your favorite film because another film somehow deserves it. I don't think that's what most Academy voters do.

To clarify, the nominations are done by the individual branches. The winners are decided by everyone (except foreign film, shorts, and documentary). So I think my argument about director and screenplay stands.

Again, many condolonces to those who are dissapointed. I do understand. I'm just trying to defend Crash, which I did love.

Anonymous said...

We can't say Academy is homophobic, not in these last years. P.S. Hoffman has won the Oscar playing a gay star as Truman Capote; Tom Hanks won the statue for "Philadelphia", his character was gay; Hilary Swank won the Oscar playing Brandon Teena we can say the same for Charlize Theron; Greg Kinnear played a gay one in "As good as It gets" and He was nominated; Ian McKellen - a great actor - received two nominations in the last years. And we cannot forget the nominations of James Ivory and the Oscars won by Howard Ashman. And what about the success of a movie like "The Crying Game" (1 Oscar winner for the screenplay? This is what I remember in this moment but sure I'm forgetting something else.
Academy is not homophobic. Hollywood is full of gay people. Isn'It? In the end We cannot forget that "Brokeback Mountain" won 3 Oscars and 2 are very important. They are DIRECTING and ADAPTED SCREENPLAY!!!! It's evident that "Crash" had much supporters in the Academy. But I'm sure "Crash" won for very little votes.

Dario, It.

NATHANIEL R said...

john p. ---yes put in perspective a little thing like a movie award is not important compared to executions, political turmoil and such. Buit this is the Oscars. The impression they leave us with should not be "oh, well it's only the movies" within this context this is a huge rejection.

and for anyone who is playing the "academy doesn't like to be told how to vote card" -PLEASE. they follow the leader every year. They are total sycophants. So, when they reject something that was as big as Schindler's List prior to Oscar night... it is a purposeful rejection.

Lily said...

I am in shock. Beyond shock. I'm devestated--or as devestated as I can be about a film. After much meditation, I can only decided that God has turned his back on us. First Johnny Weir, then Sasha Cohen, then Pete Doherty (ok, maybe that's only me), now this.

:(

Shawn Elmore said...

I'm getting sick too of people already rolling their eyes and trying to avoid the possibility of homophobia playing some part in this. What pains me the most is that middle America (where I live) is getting a KICK out of this. They are loving it. And that's what hurts. "The gay movie didn't win!" That's what I heard in the halls some today and that's what I heard last night when those people were screaming when Jack said, "Crash."

Anonymous said...

Nathaniel...stop being a baby. Just get used to the fact that Crash won and stop mourning and whining.

John P. said...

Nathaniel - I definitely agree that homophobia played a part in the Academy's decision, and I don't think it should go unchallenged. I just feel that for what Brokeback's loss is (and isn't) in the larger scheme of things, the reactions seem a little outsized.

Joe R. said...

Academy is not homophobic. Hollywood is full of gay people. Isn'It?

See, this is where the "quit yer whining" argument always trips itself up. Hollywood can't possibly be homophobic because it's "full of gay people." For one thing, more gay people per capita does not equal "full of." Second, how many out actors again? How many out leading men? We should at least acknowledge that Hollywood is somewhat conflicted about the role it allows sexuality to play in its mainstream films. Hoffman's Capote was sexless, Swank and Hanks's characters died, Theron's was righteously put on death row. This movie was different, and we all knew it, and that's why this is a bigger deal.

John P. said...

Oh, and apparently a lot of people were offended/insulted by the Brokeback to the Future trailer - why is that? I thought it was just a clever bit of re-editing in the spirit of the recut Shining/Parent Trap trailers.

brad said...

Nate -

What is up with the ongoing comparisons to SCHINDLER'S LIST? Outside of the heavy percentage of precursors both films shared, BBM is nothing in scope, historical "importance" or appeal (Hollywood is largely Jewish) of that movie.

Yes, I can understand that BBM is important to gay writers/activists but I'm sorry our struggle is nowhere near the injustices of Nazi Germany.

I believe that the writing was on the wall for a CRASH victory, and you knew that too or you wouldn't have written that long article.

CRASH carried the acting body of the AMPAS, as was clearly evident by the SAG awards. It was a very LOS ANGELES movie and fits perfectly into the mold of what the Academy traditionally honors. It appealed to black voters, democratic voters, "socially concious" voters, old voters, young voters and that was probably enough votes to make the victory.

As I've said before - homophobia, I believe, had nothing to do with it. If it did, BBM would have been a complete shut out.

You gotta get out of the gay thinktank at some point...

brad said...

P.S. --

It should be said again - whatever film wins the majority of the ACTING branch's votes is going to win. Period. CRASH was the most actor-friendly film. It had the most actors in it - and it appealed most to liberal actor's sensibilities.

They also mailed the movie to the entire membership of the SAG. It's not homophobia - its savvy marketing.

Robert said...

do u guys want to check my blog

http://illegitimate-oscar.blogspot.com

Robert said...

as a gay guy, i found myself truly dissapointed, hearthbroken and marginalised last night with the loss of brokeback. i really liked crash and it was probably the most entertaining movie of the year but it WAS NOT the BEST picture, as far as im concerned. i actually found that CAPOTE was the best pic of the yearbut hey, art cannot be compared(just like clooney said). Brokeback won everything but the gays werent noticed last night. The Academy lost a lot of legitimacy last night and i no longer view the oscars as the pinnacle of film achievement.As a side not, it is truly satisfactory that Crash won because of the message that the film adheres to. It is interesting that Paul Hagiis' scripts won the last two best pics at the oscars. how could BBM lose to Crash who went black in every other awards show this year. The academy went for the best upset instead of the best picture and its truly sad that we live in a world that would congratulate upset instead of achievement. i had crash ranked 4th, ahead of munich as the top five this year. A last thing: Thumsucker and Last Days were the two best non-oscar movies and they shouldhave been given credit. BOO TO THE ACADEMY! HOORAY FOR THE WINNERS! At least Crash will help our society understand culture and prejudice and polarization a least better with the crash film, because i felt it with BBM losing

adam k. said...

Yeah, I still am not the least bit offended by "Brokeback to the Future".

But I am offended by the general attitude of "we can just make fun of this movie all we want and not actually give it its props". It reeks of pandering and hypocrisy. Everyone was willing to give lip service to how great Brokeback Mountain is, but then at balloting time, they didn't step up to the plate. It would be like making fun of the holocaust via Schindler's List and then NOT EVEN VOTING FOR IT. Hahaha, those silly Jews.

It IS wrong for a film this widely acknowledged and parodied to lose when it was expected to be a shoe-in. It shows people's true colors. Whether they are truly homophobic or, more likely, just didn't respond to it or denied their response to it because they just don't "get it" and it's merits... it's still incredibly disheartening.

Middle-P said...

I agree with most on the board the homophobia played a small part, but I agreee more in the aspect that this is a MARKETING win. If BBM had sent of screeners to everyone living within a 25 mile radius of LA then it would have won. Hell ,if King Kong had sent out as many screeners as Crash it would have been up there to!THe fact of the matter is, it hurts. I am grieving as are many others, I am sorry Nathaniel and all in black,robes,underwear today. While I wish you all the best in your grieving process, I hope we can take the messages from Brokeback and Crash to move on from the travesty. From Brokeback: People and society may be homophobic, keep you from what you love/deserve, and tear your heart out, but you must cherish the love that you have even if some homophobic bastards(or a busted car, but we won't even start that argument) take it away from you. And from Crash: Just because people come of as racist/homophobic, we cannot let this stereotypes and assumptions tear us down. We must rise above their ignorance and be the bigger person. Let's put on our invisble cloaks, let's prouldy wear our blood stained t-shirts, and step up from the Academy's enormous blunder. Jack would not want us to wallow, but to smile knowing how he touched us, pun ENTIRELY intened. Even Crashheads realize that this is just strange and confusing, and when we can grieve, and try to understand our confusion, the we will fully be able to appreciate the masterpiece that Brokeback Mountain is.

Russ said...

Black Sunday is such a fitting title, Nathaniel. *deep sigh*

Michael Riccardi said...

Nathaniel:

Please accept my commiserations -- I could only face the day dressed in a black turtleneck, worn under a shearling coat.

My wife and I were massively upset as the results rolled in last night -- no BSA for Jake or Michelle, no BA for Heath -- and appalled by the BP snub.

Combined with Felicity's loss, Kate branded the whole show an exercise in homophobia (I know PSH was playing a gay man, but still). I'm angry, but willing to be a little less harsh in my judgment. Here goes:

Crash is OK, but let's face it, the characters are mostly symbols who deliver speeches.

I think for a viewer with a limited frame of reference (e.g. most of the actor's branch; also the retirement-home vote), a movie like Crash -- the brilliant ensemble, the cutting among stories, the bending of narrative -- comes as a revelation.

Film junkies -- directors and cinematographers, e.g. -- have seen it all before.

Even though its basic technique has been used more effectively several times before -- I'll just mention Short Cuts and Magnolia -- and its basic idea (exploring racism and alienation in LA) was done at least as well in Grand Canyon, Crash seems -- on the surface -- complex and challenging.

For me, however, Crash was a finely-crafted and acted Afterschool Special. In a word, pat.

On the other hand, Brokeback is an American classic with a twist (pun intended). It challenges the mainstream audience to accept the love of Jack and Ennis at face value, and feel the tragedy created by the closet, by intolerance.

But the pretty "surfaces" of Brokeback seems less challenging --sweeping western vistas, star-crossed love story told a thousand times before.

And I think a plurality of voters went for Crash's self-consciously "arty" surfaces over Brokeback's nods to its two genres.

What I can't explain is why Brokeback, with its emotional wallop, connected for the plurality less than Crash, which is a pretty cold piece.

The silver lining: mainstream audiences did buy into the film (it made more money than any other movies in the BP 5), and that marks a major moment in our cultural history.

No BP snub takes that away. Great art is its own reward. Thanks Ang, and thanks to you, Nathaniel, for championing this film.

Michael

chofer said...

It's amazing. WHERE THE HELL YOU CRASH FANS HAD BEEN THE PAST THREE WEEKS?????

I'M SURE NOT IN THIS BLOG!!!

YOU MOLE RATS, CRAWL BACK TO YER HOLE!!!! he, he, he

gsanders said...

Beautiful post, Michael. BBM is subversive for the way it turns the romance and the western on theirear, but without ever pointing big arrows saying, "Look at me! Look at me! I'm deconstructing two bedrock genres of cinema in one fell swoop!"

It's nice to know that BBM will have the vindication of time and future generations of movie goers on its side.

Air said...

You guys have no idea how much I'm comforted to know that other people cried and other people have moped around all day. I didn't want to feel alone in my seemingly overdramtic reaction.

Anonymous said...

CRASH is a tedious, over-explicit train wreck, but jeez, guys... am I the only gay person in the world who thought BROKEBACK was reactionary in the extreme? I mean, come on. Surely whatever mainstream success it's had is a result of its confirmation of stereotypes the heterosexual orthodoxy holds near and dear: we suffer, we're repressed until it kills us, we eventually die, heartbroken and unfulfilled. It isn't exactly "daring." That said, neither is CRASH. BROKEBACK is fifty times the picture CRASH is, but I'm not crying over any spilt milk because it didn't win. There've been worse Oscar travesties. AMERICAN BEAUTY winning when MAGNOLIA wasn't even nominated is more of an Academy miscarriage, IMHO.

Anonymous said...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHY DIDN'T MUNICH WIN BEST PICTURE! A TRAVESTY!

dannyboy said...

When I brought up my theory about the Academy not wanting to be told what to do, I didn't mean that as the ONLY reason. There were obviously many reasons, as many as there were voters, in a way. Some voted against Brokeback largely out out of homophobia, probibly enough to swing it, considering all the inside LA sources say it was a razor thin margin. (Remember what Tony Curtis said to the NY Post??) Some, however, voted against it, I'm sure, because they don't want to "follow what others do/tell them to do." I'm convinced the reason Scorsese has never won is because too many people have lectured the Academy that they absolutely MUST give him one. One of the biggest bombing jokes last night was the very joke about "Martin Scorses still having 0 Oscars."

Still, the longer the day goes on the more upset I become. Here was a chance to stand up against homophobia in America, and the Academy blinked. As Shaun said, there were a lot of homophobes celebrating last night because the "gay movie lost," and to one saying "even racists have their reasons/still no one should be racist." On the Today show this morning, Katie Couric said that her daughter's school had been showing CRASH to their students to teach them about racism, which proves my point. Politically and intellectually, crash is at a grade school level compared to Brokeback Mountain.

Anonymous said...

Hey guys, I figured out why Munich didn't win!

...

ANTI-SEMITISM

Anonymous said...

Hey Nat, hope you are well.

I know there are people who genuinely like Crash, (I am one of them) just as there are people who prefer Brokeback Mountain (I am one of those too). But given the critical response and box office support for Brokeback and the fairly lack lustre critical and box office response to Crash, it is safe to say that the only reason Crash won was because it was identified repeatedly in the media as the only alternative to Brokeback Mountain, so those members of AMPAS who wanted Brokeback to lose, for whatever reason, parked their votes with Crash. It's as simple as that. While many members of AMPAS in good faith were voting for their favorite film, be it Crash, Brokeback, Munich, Capote or Good Night and Good Luck, there was obviously a group of voters simply voting for Crash to make sure Brokeback didn't win. How else to explain away the low ratings and mediocre box office for a movie supposedly widely enough loved to pull off such a grass roots upset. As a result Crash will never be remembered as the best picture of 2005 it will be remembered as the club used to bash Brokeback.

Robert said...

i think that the more and more i see it, the academy wanted to credit the easiest movie to sell, the least countercultural/aesthethic film so that they wont have to give the award to context that affects a small portion(BBM) compared to one that affects almost everyone(Crash)
Best Picture should mean best picture, not favorite film. those are two different categories. if the critics would have picked favorite movie the last few months, we would have seen small, low-budget indies which werent noticed by the mass. critics and every other award groups gave BBM the awards because of its excellence as a film, not because of preference. the only best pic win this whole season for crash was the one in chicago. BBM won over 20. The Academy wants to be different and shocking and thats why they picked Crash. I do find some legitimacy in the homophobia that some are suggesting but i hope that its not the case(i dont think it is, well?)

bec said...

I’ve been lurking at this site for the last four years, feeding my Oscar obsession, and this is the first time I’ve felt compelled to comment, just to show solidarity with all those who believe in rewarding ‘Crash’ over ‘Brokeback Mountain’ the Academy has made a mistake of monumental proportions. Yes the Oscar is “just an award”, HOWEVER it is an award, as Clooney said that will remain synonymous with the winner from here on in. It is also an award that (in my opinion) comes to represent the ‘feeling’ of the time, rather than what film is really the “best of the year” (does anyone truly believe ‘The Greatest Show on Earth’ was the best 1952 had to offer? I think not). When Gentleman’s Agreement won in 1947 Hollywood was seen to be taking a stand against Anti-Semitism, (and although I’m well aware the ‘anonymous’ Munich comment above is intended to make people bite, I feel compelled to point out that this win renders your Anti-Semitism jibe well and truly a moot point) ditto with racism in 1967 with ‘In the Heat of the Night’, and even ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?’ sharing awards. 2006 was the Academy’s chance to be remembered as ‘taking a stance’ against homophobia. The greater issue is not whether Crash was a better film than Brokeback (…and in my opinion it wasn’t!), but that Brokeback’s loss now gives ammunition to all those far-right, Christian mouthpieces that purport the ridiculous fiction that homosexuality is a sin. The Academy has [insert whichever expletive you prefer here] up royally.

Anonymous said...

For the record, Crash did excellent in terms of box office performance. Word of mouth alone carried it to 55 million dollars. A heated topic and talk of Oscar got Brokeback most of its money.

Anonymous said...

So, if BBM had won Best Picture, would our lives have changed for the better? Would we have entered a new era of acceptance of gays? "Hey guys! BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN won Best Picture! Let's legalize same-sex marriage! YAY!"

All this hand-wringing and crying is for naught. The Oscar is an award and, like all awards, it will be quickly forgotten.

Why spend so much time focusing on this loss, when the film has clearly accomplished something positive. While I am not a fan of the film, I am thrilled that it has grossed over $78 million at the box office. That indicates to me that mainstream America is watching this film.

BBM has entered the American consciousness. At this point in history, I think that is far more important than whether or not it received the Best Picture Oscar.

Robert said...

this is my top five for this year
1. CAPOTE
2. BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
3. LAST DAYS
4. THUMSUCKER
5. CRASH

I like Crash a whole lot before last night. Now i feel that i hate it(i dont want too but its happening) this is the big problem

luca said...

Shameful. The Academy didn't only forget the 5 best films of the year (i.e. MATCH POINT, A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, BROKEN FLOWERS, THE LOST WORLD, KING KONG), but gives the Oscar to the WORST movie among the selected ones!!!Brokeback Mountain is not a masterpiece, but it was BY FAR the best movie out of those 5.
Luca from Italy

Keith said...

am I the only gay person in the world who thought BROKEBACK was reactionary in the extreme? I mean, come on. Surely whatever mainstream success it's had is a result of its confirmation of stereotypes the heterosexual orthodoxy holds near and dear: we suffer, we're repressed until it kills us, we eventually die, heartbroken and unfulfilled. It isn't exactly "daring."

No, you're not the only one; I agree entirely.

Anonymous said...

k all of u whining over Brokeback Mountain...be quiet. It LOST okay??? get used to it.

Air said...

I like Crash a whole lot before last night. Now i feel that i hate it(i dont want too but its happening) this is the big problem

WORD.

Now I want to burn my Crash DVD. I feel like the only thing I'll respect out of it again are the performances of Matt Dillon and Terrence Howard. It's a shame...but I feel almost that it's what I have to do.

dannyboy said...

"So, if BBM had won Best Picture, would our lives have changed for the better? Would we have entered a new era of acceptance of gays?"

Earning best picture would have helped the film gain some cultural "legitimacy" that would have helped it reach more viewers. Now people who have been sitting on the fence about seeing it or not, have an excuse not to. As to the effect of art on politics, I'll offer an example: Harriet Beecher Stowe's UNCLE TOM'S CABIN. While the term Uncle Tom is now a prejoritive used to describe deferential blacks, when that book came out it almost single-handedly turned public opinion against slavery. Yes, art can help make people's lives better and an Oscar win for BROKEBACK would have helped that film reach more hearts than it has already.

You know who I’m starting to feel anger toward? Roger Ebert. He did everything he could to try and shove CRASH in as the winner, including a long essay about how the film was like a modern day Charles Dickens novel.—he did that to justify CRASH’s absurd plot twists, something Dickens’ books also often had. If I had a chance, I’d ask Ebert, who just loves films dealing with race (HOOP DREAMS, EVE’S BAYOU, DO THE RIGHT THING, were all number one on his lists in their years), if he thinks it was really worth it to give the Academy’s homophobes a critical justification to vote against BROKEBACK so yet another film about race (which IS ABSOLUTELY an important topic) could win. Films about race have won best picture before: Driving Miss Daisy, In the Heat of the Night, but never one about homophobia and gay love (no, MIDNIGHT COWBOY doesn’t count,) and Ebert did his best to shove this one in there too, even though its yet another film about race by a white director, and one which spends as much time justifying the feelings of racists as it does denouncing racism. In that way, it’s just as morally confused as was MUNICH about terrorism. Happy Roger?

Vertigo's Psycho said...

The Academy Awards are still in the closet when it comes to honoring a gay themed film with its Best Picture award, regardless of how many, many awards the film picks up pre-Oscar. Sure, they'll toss a Best Actor, Best Actress, or Best Screenplay award out there every now and then, but as for the big prize, the message is clear: no way baby, not yet. Too bad as, judging the film solely on artistic merit, 'Brokeback' could have been one of Oscar's most worthy Best Picture winners.

Kamikaze Camel said...

Robert, I too liked Crash before last night (in my best of it was nominated for several categories) but now I feel like whenever I talk about it I'm gonna have a voice of disdain. I own it on DVD ($5 from Blockbuster, lol) but am I going to be able to watch it without going "YOU caused Brokeback to lose"

"Jack said he voted for Brokeback Mountain"

That surprises and delights me. The raised eybrows was just... he couldn't believe it either. He kind of stood back as well.

NATHANIEL R said...

to keith and others who think Brokeback is reactionary. how pray tell can the closet be dramatized without showing repressiong and tragedy?

the film would have been a lie if it was told in any other way. You can't rewrite history just to have a happy ending.

the tragedy IS THE POINT. Until society gets over their homophobia and until gay people get over their internalized homophobia, there will be tragedy and depression.

it's not reactionary. it's truth.

Robert said...

the thing is guys, i found that Capote was the best film this year(i saw it saturday, the night b4 the oscars) and i was 100% blown away. I liked Capote better than BBM. I Liked Crash 3rd out of the best pics but how can a movie(crash) get the oscar without winning anything prior. i think that either the academy wanted to do something different(to stir things up because they were bored) or they were too close-minded to homosexuality that they either didnt watch it or didnt want to reward it. best picture should be the best picture on the screen;it should not be based on politics. I also found that the academy wanted to show the right-wing, neo-conservatives that they would reward the liberal movie about racism and prejudice but not go far enough to reward a movie about two gay men. it "scares" me that the academy is being manipluated by politics.

Kamikaze Camel said...

But Nathaniel, there are still people saying "if Brokeback was a straight love story, nobody would care" which is the single dumbest point that had been made about the movie.

Some people can't seem to grasp why Brokeback is so monumental.

And this is from someone who was a very early championer of Crash. I saw it before it was releasedin the states and actually commented that it could be a player for Oscars. I'm still pissed off though.

Robert said...

hey nathaniel, what are the frontrunners for next year?. i heard of deniro's film the good shepherd. The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky looks pretty good

Robert said...

i want to say one last thing on CRASH! Why was Chris Ludacris helping those people at the end go free(from his truck?) what was the realistic point on that? what he saved by his prejudices. even though Crash makes the audience think and ponder about racism and prejudice, will a racist or a prejudiced person actually change his/her thoughts after the film? i dont think so. it indirectly reinforces the prejudices that social members have!!!!!!!!!!!!! The only changes that the characters had were that when a weird, strange, out of the blue situation happens, people will be helpful and wont hate minorities. Does Matt Dillon's character actually change or is he doing his JOB(Saving someone in need). There is a very good chance that the character played by Dillon is still a racist, prejudice prick. They use exaggeration to prove a point against discrimination. It doesnt tackle any of the structural racism that occurs! The film tells us that individuals create situations that may lead to tolerance. it doesnt look at the structural racism. its very "we're all the same" without looking at the real problems with prejudice(poverty, parental influence, media, etc.). it is not a movie that can really inform the public on prejudice and it uses one's consciousness as the true bearer of change????????????

Kamikaze Camel said...

Robert go to InContention. Kris posted a whole big 2006 thing.

jeff said...

Did it ever cross your mind that more people liked Crash than Brokeback? Is that possible?

stop belittling a good film like Crash.

Vertigo's Psycho said...

It doesn't belittle the merits of 'Crash' to make the point that, until March 5th, in the Academy's 78-year history a film with over 25 Best Picture honors (that movie would be 'Brokeback', of course) pre-Oscar night has never lost the Best Picture Academy Award to a film that had won no major Best Picture prizes before suddenly achieving victory at the Oscars.

Sure, plently of 'Crash' voters genuinely liked the film, but the idea 'Crash' won only on merit, with no other factors and/or agendas coming into play is a hard, no, make that an impossible pill for people to shallow when looking at the history of the Academy Awards pre-2006.

Nathaniel made a keen observation concerning this situation: put 'Crash' in the same position 'Brokeback' was in this year (namely, have 'Crash' picking up 25 Best Picture prizes), then have 'Crash' lose Best Picture to a film which had not challenged it for awards prior to the Oscars. A valid point could certainly be made that factors other than the quality of both films played into the upset win, based on the number of prizes 'Crash' won, and the history of the Oscars. However, somehow when 'Brokeback' is placed in this situation, many poo-poo any notion that unsavory factors could be at work to ANY extent. Of course not every vote for 'Crash' had to do with snubbing 'Brokeback' for political reasons but, as it would be fair and clear-headed to defend 'Crash' if it lost Best Picture to an upstart after racking up countless awards (and with no precedent for this occuring in Oscar history) it is equally suitable for many to take umbrage over the fact 'Brokeback' was suddenly shut out of a Best Picture win after dominating the awards season, and for these observate souls to wonder what issues could have come into play in the 'Crash' win/'Brokeback' loss.